Let's talk about identifications

Now that it's mid-November, my desire to go out hiking every possible day has quieted down a bit, plus I've had a couple of weeks here and there without a car, for various reasons. Thus I've been working on making identifications of other observers' observations. A LOT of identifications. And I have a few things I want to say about that.

First, it feels as though I am barely making a dent in the ever-growing flood of observations coming into iNat from New England, so I'd love some company. I know, I know, you feel as though you don't know enough, that you're not an expert, that you'd just embarrass yourself. Well, get over that. Anyone who is reading this (meaning people who follow me on iNat, I would guess) knows enough to be able to take a mushroom that's currently labeled Unknown and move it into Fungi. In fact, I bet almost all of you can ID a blooming Purple Loosestrife, or a decent photo of a Wood Frog, or even a Monarch caterpillar. I mean, I'm not an expert and I can do that!

So why did I start making IDs on other people's observations? Well, it occurred to me that the fact that other people were making IDs on my own observations, back when I started on iNat, was definitely one of the reasons I kept going and got so into hiking new places and making lots of iNat observations. I want other people, particularly people who are new to iNat or even new to looking at the natural world, to have that same sort of positive feedback. Plus, I think that the dataset that iNat observers are assembling is simply extraordinary and will become even more useful with climate change. So I resolved to make as many IDs for other people as I made observations of my own.

Second, I want to emphasize to observers (and you, dear reader, probably don't need this advice, but here goes anyway) that there are a few "rules" about making good, useful observations for iNat. Learning to use iNat has a bit of a learning curve, and it's easy to miss learning some of these rules.

iNat is primarily for wild organisms. Not pets, not garden plants, not zoo animals, not humans. If you do observe something that's not wild, mark it as such when you post it.

You can take several photos of an organism and include all of them in one observation. Conversely, each organism should have its own observation. In other words, don't photograph a squirrel, a tree, and a mushroom, and post all three photos as one observation. In such cases, no one can ID your observation properly.

When you post an observation, make sure it has an identification, even if it's something general like Animal or Plant or Fungi. Otherwise, it's labeled as Unknown by iNat and somebody like me has to go through and guess at what you observed. The easiest way to check if your observations have any ID at all is to look at the website after you upload photos. I think that it's pretty easy to forget to add an ID to an observation when you're using the phone app, as the app will upload observations whenever it has an internet connection, before you've had a chance to add an ID.

Here's a URL filtered for my Unknowns: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=any&user_id=lynnharper&iconic_taxa=unknown You can substitute your user name for mine and see if any of your observations aren't IDed. Note that Unknowns include bacteria and observations labeled Life, where no one knows has a clue about even what Kingdom was observed.

Once you've uploaded some observations, come back in a day or so and see what other people have added as IDs. If someone has added a more precise ID, that's a learning opportunity for you! Or if other people disagree with your ID, they might be right; again, that's a learning opportunity - or maybe you just made a mistake. I think I've IDed my Sweet-Fern (Comptonia peregrina) photos as Sweet Fern (Pteris macilenta) several times, for example, and I always appreciate being corrected.

When in doubt, go re-read iNat's Help documents here: https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/help Or ask me questions - I'm happy to help.

OK, enough preaching to the choir - back to work making identifications!

Julkaistu marraskuu 20, 2021 03:11 IP. käyttäjältä lynnharper lynnharper

Kommentit

Very well said!

Lähettänyt pfloyd19 yli 2 vuotta sitten

Thanks, Lynn. Good points. I have one other suggestion. Focus on one species in one generalized area. Right click on a couple dozen observations to open them to separate tabs. Become informed on this species and go through each tab to make ID's or suggestions to each, then close all the tabs and start again. It's easy to shift to the next tab in both Chrome and Safari at least by holding down command-option keys and clicking the R arrow key (or L arrow to reverse direction). With this method, you'll quickly see where observers go wrong and you can set them straight, or perhaps be delighted by how many good observations there are.

Lähettänyt wernerehl yli 2 vuotta sitten

Lynn, thanks for this post. It seems to me that with the recent growth in iNat, we somehow need to readjust the balance between observations and IDs. Thus as someone who's not great at IDs, I've become a lot more careful in posting observations. (And before you tell me about how to be better at IDs, yes I do use the keys in the Jepson manual for California, but I'm pretty slow and honestly I'm not very accurate; and as for my track record in IDing Larus species, I know my limitations). Rather than contribute way more observations than IDs, I've made the decision to cut way back on the number of iNat observations I make.

I'm not suggesting this course of action for everyone. But it makes sense for where I live and the kinds of organisms I observe. I spend most of my time looking at birds and plant phenology in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties, Calif. We have a dense concentration of iNat observers here, and way too many birders. No one needs to see my observation of the Common Murre colony on Egg Rock off the Devil's Slide Trail because there are already dozens of observations of these exact same birds on iNat -- no need to make anyone spend any time IDing my Common Murre observation. As for plant phenology, while iNat is superlative for tracking biological diversity (think bioblitzes), there are better places to post phenology observations (think Nature's Notebook, Budburst).

Mind you, I'm not doctrinaire about this. If I have some students working on leaf packs in Santa Clara County, of course I'm going to let them post photos of stream macroinvertebrates on my iNat account. But I do think we need to establish a better balance between observations and IDs, and if I can't help much with IDs then as long as I'm in place with a surfeit of iNat observations, no need to add to that surfeit.

Lähettänyt danlharp yli 2 vuotta sitten

Hi, cousin @danlharp! Now, wait a minute - don't stop observing! OK, maybe stop posting every single thing you see, but really, iNat is supposed to connect people with nature and if it helps you connect with nature, then post away! I live in Place #2 in iNat Land (aka Massachusetts) and I find there are tons of places that haven't been iNaturalized (iNatted?) in any depth, although admittedly that's not so true of eastern Massachusetts. Maybe you just need to go farther afield? Or learn lichens or mosses or ants or ground beetles?

And if I ever get out there, you can be sure I want to go see those nesting Common Murres with you - and yes, I will be posting a photo of them! (Assuming my not-so-zoomy camera will take a decent photo, ahem.)

Lähettänyt lynnharper yli 2 vuotta sitten

You should definitely come out and see the Common Murres (they will be too far away unless you have a really good zoom)!

Lähettänyt danlharp yli 2 vuotta sitten

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja