Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Circus. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Circus cyaneus 5170

Taxonomic Split 24857 (Tehty 30-08-2017)

The eBird/Clements checklist of birds... (Viittaus)
Lisännyt maxkirsch elokuu 30, 2017 02:40 IP. | Tallentanut maxkirsch elokuu 30, 2017
jakaa

Kommentit

@maxkirsch thanks for making this change
last night, I committed http://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/24850 which elevated Circus cyaneus hudsonius to Circus hudsonius
Is there a reason why the observations haven't successfully moved from Circus cyaneus (5170) to Circus cyaneus (559064) + Circus hudsonius (558446)? This should happen automatically if atlases were made

Lähettänyt loarie yli 6 vuotta sitten

I'm not entirely sure. Could it have something to do with a related taxon swap being deleted? (see https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2318737 for explanation.)

Lähettänyt maxkirsch yli 6 vuotta sitten

Wait, never mind - now it looks like observations have been swapped (I guess it was just a little delay)

Lähettänyt maxkirsch yli 6 vuotta sitten

I found a bug with this observation:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/245917
The observer's ID was swapped to the new Circus hudsonius, but the community ID still shows up as Circus cyaneus 5170 (with 100% disagreement).

Lähettänyt maxkirsch yli 6 vuotta sitten

I think there was just a lag in moving the observations over - looks good now

Lähettänyt loarie yli 6 vuotta sitten
Lähettänyt loarie yli 6 vuotta sitten

Figured it would be better to put the explanation for the period earlier today when harriers in North America were labeled Hen Harrier here:
After loarie swapped Circus cyaneus hudsonius (236973) into C. hudsonius (558446), kokhuitan committed a taxon swap of C. c. cyaneus (509495) into the old C. cyaneus (5170) and changed its name to Hen Harrier (rather than swapping the subspecies into a new C. cyaneus); I left a comment on that swap explaining that, for future reference, when a species is split, a new taxon should be created for each post-split species on iNat (rather than swapping the old nominate subspecies into the old, broader species), after which someone (presumably kokhuitan) deleted that split (the missing Taxonomic Swap 24855; in my opinion, that was a bad idea, given that it obscures the history of the taxon on iNat - better to have a record of the occurrence of an incorrect taxon change than to have no record at all). I then committed a split of the old C. cyaneus into the new C. cyaneus and C. hudsonius.

Lähettänyt maxkirsch yli 6 vuotta sitten

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja