Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Dascyllus. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Dascyllus aruanus 153194

Taxonomic Split 63751 (Tehty 22-06-2020)

http://fishbase.org/summary/Dascyllus-abudafur.html

Borsa, P., A. Sembiring, C. Fauvelot and W.-J. Chen, 2014. Resurrection of Indian Ocean humbug damselfish, Dascyllus abudafur (Forsskål) from synonymy with its Pacific Ocean sibling, Dascyllus aruanus (L.). Comptes Rendus Biologies, Elsevier Masson, 337(709-716).

Fishbase (Viittaus)
Lisännyt bouteloua lokakuu 7, 2019 03:02 IP. | Tallentanut maractwin kesäkuu 22, 2020
jakaa

Kommentit

The observations in Western Australia and around Bali are D. aruanus. The observation at Christmas Island isn't reliably identifiable due to the poor quality of the photo, though it is most likely D. aruanus.

Lähettänyt joe_fish yli 4 vuotta sitten

Question: does the "atlasing" effect future observations? For example, if someone observed the Indian Ocean taxon at Bali, will it automatically be changed incorrectly to the Pacific taxon?

Lähettänyt joe_fish yli 4 vuotta sitten

comment deleted

let's keep the conversation in one place
https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/418232

Lähettänyt bouteloua yli 4 vuotta sitten

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja