|
jakaa |
Someone has moved several Lejops species into the genus Anasimyia without changing their names. E.g. there are two copies of "Lejops bilinearis" under Anasimyia. This is confusing and weird, especially for people who aren't aware of this upcoming split. It would probably be better to keep Anasimyia as a subgenus of Lejops until this split goes through.
That said I see no reason this split shouldnt go thru already. BugGuide is lagging on all the changes associated with the new Syrphid guide until editors mostly on iNat (recently myself for a few of them) update them, and it was recently decided to move Ochlerotatus back to Aedes on iNat despite the continuing lag on BugGuide. I'm not sure it makes sense to keep waiting for BugGuide on this type of thing as in Diptera they don't seem as actively curated anymore.
@billdean is this genus split accepted globally, or still controversial?
@billdean I would favor making these changes on iNaturalist then, but do you know where I can find a list instructing which specific epithets go with which updated genera?
For North America I can get that information at http://www.canacoll.org/Diptera/Staff/Skevington/Syrphidae/Syrphidae_Nearctic_Checklist.htm
but is there a corresponding reference for the Old World and Neotropics?
@johnklymko do you think you could help? It's been too long.
I don't know how to help. I agree the split is overdue for the Nearctic fauna. @billdean raises a good point about other regions.
@upupa-epops you first introduced me to all the central American 'Lejops" - those go in Asemosyrphus now I think.
Thanks @edanko!
I assume we're waiting for BugGuide to move ahead with this?