Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Chionactis. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Chionactis occipitalis 27289
Päivitä sisältösi

Taxonomic Split 84958 (Tehty 11-11-2020)

See https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/445206
Both Reptile Database (RD) and SSAR carve off
Chionactis occipitalis annulata & Chionactis occipitalis klauberi as Chionactis annulata annulata & Chionactis annulata klauberi
RD also lumps Chionactis into Sonora (e.g. Sonora occipitalis & Sonora annulatus) but I'm not doing that yet since SSAR hasn't done that yet

tuntematon
Lisännyt loarie marraskuu 12, 2020 12:05 AP. | Tallentanut loarie marraskuu 11, 2020
jakaa

Kommentit

Did this apply correctly? It's keeping a lot of "Mojave" shovelnose outside of the range.

Lähettänyt silversea_starsong yli 3 vuotta sitten

I haven't committed it yet (but was about to)

Lähettänyt loarie yli 3 vuotta sitten

committed now - but will take a while to process

Lähettänyt loarie yli 3 vuotta sitten

I just realized this was a series of taxon changes, not just one, and this one is still draft.

Lähettänyt silversea_starsong yli 3 vuotta sitten

you can read more here https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/445206 I held off on spliting Chilomeniscus stramineus into straminea, fasciata & cincta and lumping Chionactis and Chilomeniscus into Sonora (as RD does) since SSAR doesn't - but both RD and SSAR are going with this occipitalis/annulata split so it seems uncontroverslai

Lähettänyt loarie yli 3 vuotta sitten

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja
iNaturalist-verkoston jäsen   |   Palvelun tarjoaa avoimen lähdekoodin iNaturalist-ohjelmisto |   Dokumentaatio kehittäjille