Animals killed on our roads. Data will be shared with other surveys of this problem.

if you add Habitat (s afr) no other data is needed for the EWT Roadkill project: it is all already on iNat.

To see the species most affected by roadkill, click

Lähettänyt tonyrebelo tonyrebelo, 28. marraskuuta 2017 08:37



Project Roadkill documents animals being squashed on our roads.
From this the impact of roads and traffic on animals can be monitoried.

To participate: simply photograph the dead beasts you find on our roads and add the tag "Roadkill"

** Comments
14 April 2015 - 11:43AM Peter Pearson
A good idea to collate roadkill ( I prefer RTA) this way.
BUT, given that there may be a number of young people who may take this up, most have mobile phones with cameras, it may be a good idea to suggest caution.
Most RTA's seem to be on fast stretches of road particularly dual carriageways where even the most daring souls would not venture.
Just a thought.

14 April 2015 - 12:46PM Tony Rebelo
That goes without saying. Make sure when taking photos for the collection that you do not become part of the collection.

14 April 2015 - 4:44PM jimmymac2

Very funny!

Lähettänyt tonyrebelo yli 2 vuotta sitten (Lippu)

23 April 2015 - 11:32AM Tony Rebelo

21st April 2015
Surveys of wild animals killed by passing traffic (roadkill) have produced strong data and several recommendations. This is according to Bridgestone, which sponsored the Endangered Wildlife Trust's (EWT) recent investigations into the issue of roadkill in the Pilanesberg National Park.
The surveys, conducted by the EWT between 21 October and 23 November 2014, consisted of on-site investigation of roadkill as well as questionnaires completed by 302 visitors to the park. Of the 120 roadkill observed by the roadkill research team, 62 were amphibians, 27 were reptiles, 20 were birds, ten were mammals and one was not identifiable.
Vehicle numbers were monitored by the use of traffic counting devices. However, the roadkill research team soon discovered that elephants had taken a liking to the devices and damaged them. Drawing on previous research which has shown that elephants dislike the smell of chilli pepper, the team then applied a daily coating of chilli pepper and oil onto the counters. The traffic counting devices were then protected from further damage.
One of the most interesting aspects of the project was the role of speed in contributing to roadkill. “More than 95% of respondents to the questionnaire survey believe that speed is the sole cause of roadkill. Our aim was to investigate this issue in more detail,” said the EWT's Wildlife and Roads Project Executant, Wendy Collinson.
Compliance with park speed limits was found to be high, with 72% of the 6981 vehicles monitored driving at or below the speed limits. In order to investigate the role of speed in determining rates of roadkill, the research team placed fake animals on the road and observed the behaviour of 201 drivers. “Of these drivers, almost 70% were considered to not be looking at the road, but rather scanning the bush for wildlife”, said Collinson. “This suggests that many roadkills in national parks happen because of the expectation that animals are to be found in the habitat alongside the road, rather than on the road itself”, she added.
The team did not find a significant relationship between the number of fake animals hit and the speed at which the vehicles were travelling, with 71.5% of drivers driving over the animals when assessed to be driving less than 20 km/h, 62.1% when driving between 20-40 km/h, and 74.2% driving more than 60 km/h.
“From our survey, it seems that observation levels of the driver, rather than the speed of the vehicle, is the key factor in preventing roadkills,” Collinson commented. “One of our recommendations from the latest roadkill survey is that a driver awareness campaign be launched in parks to make drivers more aware of animals on the roads themselves,” Collinson commented.
Collinson also said she was concerned about the low awareness levels of roadkills among park visitors. “Of the 284 respondents who had visited a park previously, only 2.8% had noticed roadkill, with 6.3% noticing a roadkill on their current visit,” she explained.
Steven Dell, Pilanesberg National Park’s Field Ecologist remarked, “despite the use of road signs both at the park gates and within the park as well as efforts to raise public awareness of roadkill, roadkill still occurs. This project was extremely beneficial to the park as it has assisted in identifying the cause for roadkill and will enable us to focus our future public awareness efforts.”
Bridgestone PR Manager, Desirée van Niekerk, said the results of the latest roadkill survey had proved as fascinating as ever. “Bridgestone has been involved with the roadkill project for three years now, and we applaud Wendy and her team's contribution to both road safety and wildlife protection,” she said. “We hope these latest findings will soon be used to improve the quality of the experience of park visitors and safeguard the animals in these protected areas,” she concluded.
The next stage of the project will shortly commence in Addo Elephant National Park.
The EWT’s Wildlife and Roads Project in Pilanesberg was supported by Bridgestone SA, Arrow Bulk Logistics, Pilanesberg National Park, Copenhagen Zoo, Mikros Traffic Monitoring and Africa:Live. For further information please contact Wendy Collinson on

Wendy Collinson Project executant: Wildlife and Roads Project Endangered Wildlife Trust Tel: +27 11 372 3600
Shelley Lizzio Manager: National Biodiversity and Business Network Endangered Wildlife Trust Tel: +27 11 372 3600
Lillian Mlambo Communications Manager Endangered Wildlife Trust Tel: +27 11 372 3600
Desiree van Niekerk PR Manager BRIDGESTONE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD Tel: +27 11 923 7501

Lähettänyt tonyrebelo yli 2 vuotta sitten (Lippu)

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja