Sturnella. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Sturnella magna 9528
Taxonomic Split 124233
(Tehty 14-06-2023)
|
|
jakaa |
|
Kommentit
and these as well
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124235
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124236
this is the only change left to make from last year's Clements update, right? once this is done, the source listed for the bird taxon framework can be updated to Clements Checklist v2022
is it ready to go if I commit
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124235
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124236
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124233
?
I'd hate to have to revert this because of some complaint about the boundary etc
I just double checked the atlas for this split and found one minor error in Coahuila which I've rectified. The range map polygons are not quite correct (e.g. they include Guerrero and Oaxaca for S. lilianae), but the atlases are correct.
So, yes, ready to go.
ok split - fingers crossed
awesome. I do have a long list of observation ID's saved, so I can go back and double check in case there's anything funny that happens during the split. Mostly from the range boundaries
@loarie sorry to bug you about this again, but is there any chance that we could commit this one? With both taxonomies active people are using both, which is suboptimal.