Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of 
Virginicae. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Sporobolus virginicus 169307
Virginicae. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Sporobolus virginicus 169307
Taxonomic Split 126787
(Tehty 09-06-2023)
|
|
jakaa |
|
Kommentit
Yea, they were merged accidentally a few years back despite both being accepted by POWO. This split brings us back in line with their taxonomy
"merged accidentally"... I hate that. This is a big and recurrent problem, each time someone follows blindly a lumper point of view without criticism !
Thanks for explanation.
Errol.
agreed. fortunately the ranges are distinct so it was easy enough to split them back.
In this case OK, what a luck !
Lisää kommentti
Kirjaudu sisään
tai Rekisteröidy
lisätäksesi kommentteja
Waou! The problem, I suppose, is that a lot of Mediterranean "virginicus" are now S. pungens ?