Taxonomic Swap 132021 (Tehty 10-10-2023)

POWO (Viittaus)
Lisännyt kelian_gtr lokakuu 10, 2023 12:00 IP. | Tallentanut kelian_gtr lokakuu 10, 2023
korvattu seuraavalla:

Kommentit

OK but if we follow then we'll have a lot of species to be swapped !
https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:9867-1#children

Lähettänyt abounabat 7 kuukautta sitten

@blue_celery @abounabat @choess
Hi, after having swaped Cirsium sect. epytrachis to Lophiolepsis , i m considering more and more it was a wrong decision because it has create an useless confusion and a huge work is required to restaure all taxas, ID.
So my question is simple, should I swap Lophiolepsis to Cirsium sect. epytrachis and add deviation ?

Lähettänyt kelian_gtr 6 kuukautta sitten

I'm afraid I don't know very much about thistles. I would look to see who are top observers/identifiers in that section, and also see if there is any relevant literature and if the authors have iNaturalist accounts, and tag those people in.

I don't always agree with POWO's lumping and splitting decisions, so I think sometimes making deviations as you've suggested is fine, but I don't know enough about this clade to judge what the right treatment is.

Lähettänyt choess 6 kuukautta sitten

no specific opinion. I'd need to check the phylogeny in order to having one...

Lähettänyt abounabat 6 kuukautta sitten
Lähettänyt kelian_gtr 6 kuukautta sitten

yes but to be a monophyletic group do not necessarily exclude the whole genus also is a good monophyletic group...

Lähettänyt abounabat 6 kuukautta sitten

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja