Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of 
Otospermophilus. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Otospermophilus beecheyi 180007
Otospermophilus. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Otospermophilus beecheyi 180007
Taxonomic Split 135004
(Tehty 23-09-2024)
|
|
jakaa |
|
Kommentit
@loarie please can this be committed, thanks
Subspecies swap (O. b. douglasii to O. douglasii) https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_swaps/135021
What's the story with Sacramento County? All of the observations were kicked back to genus. This should be part of O. beecheyi, right? Or am I missing something?
Thanks for the heads-up @alexbinck, I'll review them. I'm not sure what happened. O. beecheyi was atlased for Sac County, https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases/12. Ah, the atlas for O. douglasii was messed-up (https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases/98999); it included Sac County (and Nevada County). I'll take the blame for this, but not sure how it happened, but this was all set it up and reviewed it last year (whoops!). Sorry.
~Brian
Lisää kommentti
Kirjaudu sisään
tai Rekisteröidy
lisätäksesi kommentteja
I believe this outlines the basis for the taxonomic change and the range map adjustments, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zaKja9z-rN6tgsJ8dkYy-DQm8YMkcyyo/view?usp=drive_link