Taxonomic Merge 25895 (Tehty 20-10-2017)

Cervus canadensis nelsoni and Cervus canadensis manitobensis are not considered separate taxa from the nominate Cervus canadensis canadensis, which was previously recognized as the "Eastern Elk", the extirpated wapiti population east of the Mississippi. The IUCN typically notes recently extirpated taxa, but instead claims C. c. canandensis represents the majority of the North American population. (http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/55997823/0) This reflects increasing consensus among geneticists that subspecific taxa for the wapiti are inflated (Ludt et al., 2004). (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790303003841?via%3Dihub) Some authorities would go so far as to say there is only one subspecies in North America (meaning it would include the Tule and Roosevelt Elks), but until greater consensus emerges regarding that information, it is safer to conform to iNat's databases.

Cervus canadensis (errata version pub... (Viittaus)
Kyllä
Lisännyt bobby23 lokakuu 20, 2017 05:49 IP. | Tallentanut bobby23 lokakuu 20, 2017
yhdistetty

Kommentit

@john8 @joshuagsmith, you two seem to be pretty familiar with this species. Does my reasoning sound good? I'm hesitant to make such an immediate change for an organism with so many observations attributed to it.

Lähettänyt bobby23 yli 6 vuotta sitten

I haven't studied Elk subspecies and, therefore, do not feel qualified to make any suggestions here. Can I help you by finding some mammal biologists on iNat?

Lähettänyt joshuagsmith yli 6 vuotta sitten

I'm not sure how necessary that would be. I was just curious if you or anyone else had any strong feelings for keeping the Rocky Mountain Elk distinct. Generally, I feel that many megafauna subspecies are designated arbitrarily.

Lähettänyt bobby23 yli 6 vuotta sitten

Bobby, I'm on more or less the same page as Joshua. Although I frequently attempt to designate Elk to subspecies (Rocky Mountain, Roosevelt and Tule), I only do so because, as with many distinctive bird subspecies, I've learned to recognize them over the years and so ID observations to the most specific level possible. However, I am certainly no expert on the matter, and if we simply lump all subspecies into one, that wouldn't bother me too much.

Lähettänyt john8 yli 6 vuotta sitten

Lisää kommentti

Kirjaudu sisään tai Rekisteröidy lisätäksesi kommentteja