Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of 
Caesalpinieae. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Caesalpinia 48315
Caesalpinieae. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Caesalpinia 48315
Taxonomic Split 74467
(Tehty 05-04-2020)
|
|
jakaa |
|
Kommentit
I'll take a crack at the Arizona observations. Most of them appear to be commonly cultivated species in urban areas.
Edit: Well, that was easy - there were only seven for the state. I think I can branch out a little.
ha - thanks!
It looks like this split is slow to go through, so some more changes might be added over the next few hours.
I will check mexican species
Hi @bouteloua , I can take a look at the species of the Yucatan Peninsula.
Awesome, there were around 450 observations at rank tribe last time I checked and now we're down to 341. ☺
Lisää kommentti
Kirjaudu sisään
tai Rekisteröidy
lisätäksesi kommentteja
@ tagging some top identifiers who may be able to help refine these observations that are currently at rank=tribe for Caesalpinieae:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&taxon_id=747312&lrank=tribe
@pioleon @jeanphilippeb @francisco3_tutor @blakesito @adorantes @ripleyrm @stevejones @najera_tutor @cwbarrows @susanmf @alexiz